:Antoine Lavoisier:: "I want to be in the timeline where "AI safety" is a fun Redhat kind of Larpy discipline of checking how many classified memos Gemeni binged on last week rather than a figurative and literal fellatio of the ML engineer bros Its clearly a caste system being engineered in real time to My eyes" / Blueviewer

:Antoine Lavoisier:@antoinelavoisier.bsky.social·2026-09-27T16:52:25.276Z

I want to be in the timeline where "AI safety" is a fun Redhat kind of Larpy discipline of checking how many classified memos Gemeni binged on last week rather than a figurative and literal fellatio of the ML engineer bros Its clearly a caste system being engineered in real time to My eyes

Kai S.@kai-teknon.bsky.social·2026-09-27T17:04:49.191Z #

This. “AI safety“ should just be good old fashioned data privacy and security, but with LLMs thrown in. Instead it is rapey shitheads who think they’re Odd John but are actually just deeply stupid.

The Infinitely Prolonged@wowbaggert.bsky.social·2026-09-27T17:09:20.645Z #

One of the ways I could tell it was a hype cycle was that everyone is talking about how “everything is changed and everything that came before is irrelevant” when it’s all 98% exactly the same. Because it always is.

Disembodied Head Lynch@goatburgler.bsky.social·2026-09-27T17:08:30.421Z #

LLMs themselves, as they exist now, couldn't exist with "good old fashioned data privacy and security." I'm personally fine with that but I'm not a billionaire so wgaf what I think. Add existing copyright law and it's nothing but a crime machine.