Caravelle@caravellin.bsky.social·2026-10-01T07:33:19.856Z
I read the story and I find it extremely... interesting that he set up a world where by his apparent rationalist principles the *right* ending has humanity transformed to eliminate suffering, but he clearly *hates* this ending and both the "normal" ending and "true" endings frame it as bad... 1/2

Caravelle@caravellin.bsky.social·2026-10-01T07:38:29.382Z#
... and I can think of only two moral reasoning frameworks that justify this ending being bad: 1) the human species is more important than all others, screw it & 2) consent is a primordial value, equivalent to or even above suffering & life But (2) is never even touched on. Too prudish I guess!